李察通訊 leecha.blogspot.hk

leecha.blogspot.hk

2009年5月31日星期日

時代精神

Dear Mr. Lee chard,

I haven't email you long time already.
This time l forward a link for your reference as below. it's a 2 hours long video on "Zeitgeist". I don't know if you mentioned it before. But once l finished watching it. its concept remind me your sayings. it's sth about consciousness and love. really wants to share with you.

I am sorry I can't find a chinese version for this video.

Yours
Chung



Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:38:10 -0700




sharing .
gz

Zeitgeist Addendum
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7065205277695921912




李察回應;


Dear Chung,

謝謝寄來這套關於「時代精神」的長片。我只看過其中
的十幾分鐘。但相信,這片是有一看價值的。過幾天有
空,一定詳細看。

所謂「時代精神」,雖然是略為抽象一些,但關心的人
也不少。為何我們的時代日益向下?我們都渴想知道。

2009年5月26日星期二

盧武鉉的遺言,有甚麼意思?

盧武鉉有何遺言?



Don't be too sad.

Life and death are all parts of nature.

Don't be sorry.

Don't blame anyone.

Accept it as FATE.

- (據 nyts 亞洲版)

南韓是深受儒學影響的地方。看南韓的電視劇,就知道。
想不到,儒家那種安於天命,接受命運的想法,竟有
這樣明顯的表現。

如果都「接受」了,大家「無奈」一番,所有的問題,
都會永遠存在,不可能解決。

如果他有錯,為何不敢承認?只敢承認命運?

如果他沒有錯,為可不敢抗爭到底?以生命抗爭到底,
不是更好嗎?橫豎他己想到了死。為甚麼不死得痛快
些?

因為,長期的教育,他的腦,己被程式化了。


儒家害人不淺。

2009年5月21日星期四

為甚麼不要幫趁宣傳吃喝玩樂的無良商人?

Dear Pun,

你問,某位作家 xx 是否就是宣傳吃喝玩樂?

李察不願說。

但是,很明顯,這是一種有策略的推動。我們小小百姓,
在這樣的潮流之前,只能潔身自愛,不要讓物質潮流污染了
自己。

如果李察的觀察不錯,這一種推動,是從1967年左右
開始的。

李察上

李察的意思,並非這幾句

Leechard,

I agree with your words that the decline of Chinese is not mainly due to the meteorological factors, nor the economic factors, but the Confusicans factors which had lead to a decline in Chinese thinking. I wish that in very soon future, those people who study Chinese history shall always take your point in mind while they read mr wong and other historians work, then they would get a more clearer picture on what has happened in China in these thousands of years......


Best wishes,
William


Dear William

請看清楚,李察的意思,並非這幾句:mainly due to the meteorological factors, nor the economic factors, but the Confusicans factors which had lead to a decline in Chinese thinking. 又或者是你串錯字了?


李察上

無言之感激

Ted 已針對您的文章「之五十二:為甚麼會「痛」?」留下新意見:

幸福與痛苦都是生命一部分,如光影的並存。大概不要走極端,幸福之餘要反思,痛苦之餘要保持希望,平衡一些就是好的人生。

ted


李察回應:

Dear Ted,

衷心的謝謝你。

2009年5月20日星期三

黃仁宇的問題是甚麼?

Dear William

謝謝數封來信。其中一來信推薦李察和李察的
讀者閱讀黃仁宇的作品。

但是,李察以為,黃仁宇的作品,並未能夠看到
歷史的本質方面。他採用的,是西方的外在觀察
方式。他無法看見中國歷史的根本問題,是內在的,
是靈性上的。一群右腦偏向的統治者,採用了儒學
的方式治國,就有了如此結果。看歷史要內外並觀。
他的好處是使人看見了一點現象。但壞處是以為,
針對這些外在現象,問題就可能解決。
中國落後的主要原因,並非如他所說,資本無法
累積,或貪污、行政效率低、甚至是雨量線等理由。

李察上

2009年5月18日星期一

願成為[張郎].

但願如此

更高, 更帥, 更英俊….. 海遠但願如此.
如能嬴得[蝴蝶]近身, 海遠更願成為[張郎].

2009年5月17日星期日

The problem of rats

See wearethinking.blogspot.com

哈哈鏡

哈哈鏡

海遠每天早上, 都要對鏡整理衣冠 : 打呔, 梳頭, 穿西裝, 返工… 悶出鳥來.
晚上看看李察先生的哈哈鏡, 其樂無窮.


李察回應:

如果你買西裝,時裝店裡的也是特殊設計的哈哈鏡:你會更高,更帥,更英俊、、、

2009年5月16日星期六

please check the spellings

Dear William

please check the spellings:

Shellery, Holmes, and Goethe......

Leechard

2009年5月15日星期五

你的卻是哈哈鏡

現代荷馬




李察先生寫出新劇本 : [蟑螂甲大戰蟑螂乙], 可喜可賀.

海遠想起古典史詩 : [希臘大戰特洛伊].

兩者都是一場文化戰爭, 都是用一個 [美女] 做借口.

李察先生可以成為現代版本的[荷馬]........



李察回應:

古人說,以銅為鏡,可正衣冠。
但你的卻是哈哈鏡。你把李察放得太大了。
只是一場笑話呢。照得不好,只是個小丑吧了。

thanks so much.....

Leechard,

I udnerstand that you are now occupied with the task of producing the story of cockroaches in your blog, and I wish to see that you can produce a story, inspiring, and interesting, for all of your readers and fans here to see.

I also wish that you could accede to my request of publishing these three letters, one is the pope Israel visit, one is the Mexican women showing human virtues, one is the discovery of early time RNA synthesis process from other starch compound......

William


Dear William

thanks so much.....

Leechard

收到了來函

DEAR William

收到了數封長長的資料。只是這幾天思索蟑螂的問題,
無暇處理。

兩千年前猶太人拒絕耶穌,同時拒絕耶穌愛的訊息。
不知他們今天有沒有進步。

今天激烈指責教宗的人,大約是看不到這一點。

李察上

2009年5月13日星期三

李察不能說,她「應該」或「不應該」做甚麼

Leechard,

Do you mean that she should refuse to marry Prince Charles? If she refused, she has wisdom?

I admire your broad knowledge of everything. Excuse my poor English.

Cathy

Dear Cathy

李察不能說,她「應該」或「不應該」做甚麼呢。

因為,智慧就是她自己的抉擇呢。
海遠先生也說得極好。如果她能看到,他們無非
都是蟑螂 A 和蟑螂 B 而己。這樣,抉擇就不會太
困難了。

李察上

蟑螂A 蟑螂B 而已

莊子不會贊同蟑蝴戀

蟑螂蝴蝶, 分屬兩個不同世界. 一個在溝渠, 一個在花間. 勉強走在一起, 必然痛苦. 何須選擇? 金鑽又如何?

英國王子埃及王子, 蟑螂A蟑螂B而已. 蝴蝶走入蟑螂世界, 死於溝渠之中, 竟要歸咎於[狗仔隊]?

[相濡以沫, 不如相忘於江湖].

這是 真莊子/偽莊子 所說的?

這是 灑脫/冷酷 ?

願聽李察先生分析.
海遠



Dear 海遠先生:

你的意見,棒極了。

讓我們舉杯! 莊子會來跟你同飲的。

李察上

2009年5月9日星期六

century of disasters

William 已針對您的文章「Privatization is another form of Capitalism」留下新意見:

Leechard,

I understand what your argument means :The so called privatization is only another form of Capitalism, which can go nowhere but down turn. It is a saying by many socialists, most notably the Labour politician Aneurin Bevan this in 1950s. Bevan in his resignation speech in 1950, proclaimed that Britain “assumed the moral leadership of world.”, “There is one hope for mankind for mankind, and that hope still remains in this island.”, “It is from here we tell the world where to go and how to go there, but we must not follow behind the anarchy of American competitive capitalism which is unable to restrain itself at all.” But neither he nor Thatcher had given us the vision, and suggested the feasible ways to solve this problem out. Bevan, with his Labour party, led Britain to a state close to bankruptcy, that gave the opportunity in 1951 election for Winston Churchill and Conservatives to go back to government and implement their pro-capitalist policies

Surely, my utterances, and the utterances of many people, that on the brink of communism, or capitalism is of no useful service to solve the downward-turn problem of the century, but rather making us more partisan, and more biased towards a particular view. This is why i think that Roy Jenkins, another famous British politican, perspective in 1980s is perhaps the best of all. Roy Jenkins in his famous Home thought from Abroad speech in 1979 , said: “Yet when they-conservatives and labours-are seeking power there is often a shrill and unconvincing attempt to portray other side as either a fool or a knave”. However the history is, Thatcher, not Jenkins, would come to the counsels of sovereign, and had the power to command the state to move in capitalist direction. Jenkins, the leader of liberal democratic party at that time, would only go into opposition in parliament. It seems to me, and to other observers that the Thatcherite economy, rather than the Jenkins words, that was more impressed by British public, as what taokit has suggested.

After adopting your perspectives, I may say, the greatest leader in 1990 should not be Reagan, Thatcher, but Havel, the Czech leader in 1990s. In his first inauguration speech on 27 December 1989, he said Let us teach ourselves and others that politics should be an expression of an desire to contribute to happiness of society rather than of a need to cheat or rape the community. This is very close to what you said recently on the real nature of politics, and I think, as we would adopt a great historic perspective, we would see how great Havel is his times.

All the above words from these great people can be found from a book named as The Penguin book of Twentieth Century Speeches. I am looking forward to hearing your comments on that.

Best wishes,
william

Dear William,

I do hope you can have your own opinion. People tend to use classification method to replace their thinking power. Socialist? or Capitalist? Once classified, everything is settled. The downward trend? So and So had said it long ago. But the point is whether we can see into the ture picture of all this. Did you see how people suffer? Did you see we are actually going nowhere?

And, the trend can not be limited in a few words. It is the trend of the external focus of things, it is the trend of the left brain, it is the trend of greed and cowardice.

The 20th century is a century of war.

The 21st century, may be a century of disasters.....

Hope we can have courage enough to study more.

Leechard

2009年5月7日星期四

Privatization is another form of Capitalism

Leechard,

I wish also to ask you to see a taokit article on Margaret Thatcher, which I think his points, though may seem too extreme, has pointed out how Thatcher has saved Britain, at the brink of being a Communists state, which would lead British into a path of hunger, poverty, and deteriorating human spirit, and the road to become a chaotic state. Thatcher gave the power to the engine of private enterprises, and encouraged and enabled them to upgrade and reform, so that they would be more modernized, more updated than before. This helped to revive British economic strength to a world class level. I think it is she, at the turning point in 1970s, that changes the shape of Britain, when the whole world saw Britain was a sick man of Western Europe, and it was then in declining stage, perhaps finishing stage....

Best wishes,
William


Dear William

Thatcher is a technical woman. She can only help mangaging an old machine, revising the machine a little bit.

She can never see how the world changes. Nor can she see the downward trend of
the 21 Century.

The so called privatization is only another form of Capitalism, which can go nowhere but down turn.

We are now in an up-side-down state.(NOT "THE BRINK OF COMMUNISM...") I do hope you can see it.

Leechard

2009年5月5日星期二

【愛情小測驗】

peggy 寄來 這小測驗。蟑螂和蝴蝶,也有了婚前的最佳輔導了〉




【愛情小測驗】神準的心理測驗(99.12.21)
 (按下面的步驟一步一步做,不要作弊,否則你的希望會落空)
 (用3分鐘完成)
 發送這封郵件的人說:她的願望在10分鐘內變成現實,記住:不要有欺騙行為。
 (這個游戲的結果非常有趣,注意:按順序往下讀,不能跳躍地往下讀)
 (只要花 3分鐘-值得一試)
 (首先拿一只筆和一張紙)
 (當你在選擇人的名字時,保証是你確實認識的,並且是憑第一直覺)
 (每次向下移動一行──記住:不要跳躍的往下讀)
 ( 1。首先,在一列中寫下 1到11的序號(即1。2。3。4。5。6。7。8。9。10。11。)
 (2。在序號1和2的旁邊,寫下你所想的任意兩個數字)
 (3。在序號3和7的旁邊,寫下任意兩個異性的名字)
 (注意:不要跳躍的向下看)
 (4。在序號4、5和6的旁邊,寫下人(朋友或親戚……)的名字)
 (不要有欺騙行為)
 (5。在序號8、9、10、11的旁邊,寫下4首歌的名字)
 (6。最後,許一個願)
============================
〔解答〕
 1.你必須把這個游戲告訴給(序號2旁邊寫下的數字)個人。
 2.序號3是你所愛的人。
 3.序號7是你所喜歡的但不能與之相伴的人。
 4.序號4是你最關心的人。
 5.序號5是非常了解你的人。
 6.序號6是你幸運之星。
 7.序號8的歌適合序號3中的人。
 8.序號9的歌適合序號7中的人。
 9.序號10的歌最能代表你的想法。
 10.序號11的歌是你對生活的感受。
 (讀完這封郵件後,在 1個小時之內發給10個人,如果照此做了,你的許願就會變成現實,否則,就會事與願違)

Who is more beautiful???? Aung San or Diana?????

Cathy 已針對您的文章「戴安娜公主怎樣死?蟑螂是有文化的嗎?之十二」留下新意見:

Dear Leechard,

I think you said that Aung San Suu Kyi of Burma is even more beautiful than Princess Diana in one column. Was it true or not?

Cathy




Leechard said:


Yes, I think she is.
And she is much much more balanced.
She has got widsom.

2009年5月4日星期一

Privatization and Margaret Thatcher

Leechard,

4th May this year will be the 30th anniversary of the begining of Margaret Thatcher, the British prime minister in the 1980s. Under her leadership, ....The privilisation, key theme of Thacterite economy, has shifted the controlling power of many industry from government to the private sector, and is, as some critics suggested, the underlining factor to cause the current financial crisis.......


Best wishes,
william

2009年5月1日星期五

柏楊逝世一周年

Leechard,

I cannot forget that 29/4, yesterday. This date is mostly remembered by many people concerning the future of China and Chinese culture because an unexpected event occured. 柏楊, the famous writer, died on that day a year ago. I wish to take this opportunity to express my profound gratitude towards this gentleman, who have inspired us to think in a new perspective on the whole course of Chinese culture.

I think you will feel the same too.

Best wishes,
william

李察的回應:

歷史的定律是:時間距離愈遠,偉大的人愈是偉大,而渺小的人愈是渺小。
因為,我們需要用時間來提高層次。