a letter from James, and can you guess the strange characters .......

Dear Leechard,
>
> Thanks for your package. It's a bonus to receive them,
> esp during the very cold weather, it's part of 'supplementary
> motivation' for life.
>
> ¡uÃä½t¤Æ¡vªº«Â¤O
「邊緣化」的威力
: wide-spreaded & very influential.
> Only recently I learned of the extensive 'fakes' in Chinese
> traditional dectrine books, "jins". How come that generally Chinese people
> ignore the unreliable nature of the books, & their belief, &
> their teaching.
>
> The topic of ¥j¥v¿ë 古史辨seem so remote, seldem raised up
> in our mind.
>
> The issue of '¤¤°ê¿ë°°¥v' '¼h²Ö¦a³y¦¨ªº¤¤°ê¥j¥v'
'中國辨偽史''層累地造成的中國古史'
from
> ÅU¾e­è 顧頡剛only came
>
> to my notice from a paper criticizing Kuo.
>
> Do you think that during the 192x-193x Chinese are
> more liberal &
>
> open-minded than present, regarding the beliefs of
> Confusism?
>
> Again thanks for your daily questions & discussion.
>
> Regards,
> James

>
>
>
> >
>


Dear James,

Thanks so much. Your finding about the earlier Chinese thoughts
like 192x-193x are more liberal, is very very stimulating.

It pushes one to think: Why is it so?

This is an important issue. Hope we could dig deeply into it.

Your friend
Leechard