收到你的ＤＶＤ光碟

李察先生：

收到你的ＤＶＤ光碟,謝謝!十分好看!先生的專欄看了多年,
今次卻是首次看到先生的視像和聲音。有否想把它上傳到youtube類的網站？

在西方的英文報紙,Section A總有一頁刋登讀者意見或回應。在中文報紙較少見,
比較上似乎互動潛力較。但随着新聞綱上化,（多附即時回覆的功能),情況變成
「你想不想自己的意見在網上永恆留傳？」

"high quality newspaper and poor quality newspaper"
===================================================
在不同圖書館看見的一個現象:
high quality newspapers always remain high quality physically
-- as it seems nobody has touched or read it.
One does not have to wait to read it.

Lower quality newspapers are always in lower quality physically
-- it could be torned as many have read it already, missing
pages, etc. Most of the time, you have to wait in line in order
to read it.

In a library, the factor of affordability in financial term is
removed. And is it safer to assume library user are better
reader in general than non-library user in the average population.
What does this informal observation indicate?

Does the type of product/service that the majority wishes/wants
reflect the culture/value/wisdom in the soceity?

Why it seems less people choose to support (by buying or reading)
a high quality newspaper nowaday ?


公利和愛心為前提的商業
======================

從事零售有一段時間,看見有公利愛心質優的產品未必一定受歡迎,甚至要結業。
伯樂是否不存在消費者當中?很多時，它們的成本以至售價高少許，可是它的推廣---名府其實,絕不誇大。

價廉、質常可劣和有漂亮謊言、幻想的產品卻大買,至少會買來試一試。

在商塲,鈔票代表自由消費者的投票。若大多數（不論被誤導與否）都支持平劣貨,
盜板光碟軟件,這是否另一邊緣化?

or
The majority of the people deserve what they get?
However, the environment is paying a huge cost.
or Even worse, the majority decide what everyone would get?

So the sinking continues . . .

請大家一齊想想辦法！

Jordan

李察回應：

謝謝你欣賞這 dvd 光碟。這是李察一次演講的錄影呢。這dvd 是沒有版權，
歡迎上傳的。

另，
好貨沒人買，劣貨大家搶.........
似乎是很常見的現象。

但人為控制民生物價，卻是非常吃緊的大問題呢。你
說得極好：

So the sinking continues . . .

請大家一齊想想辦法！



李察上