李察請問你對豬流感的意見如何？

Leechard,

.......I think this is another event, after SARS in summer 2003, that has terrified many publics in many countires because of its high infection power, and the lethal risk associated with it. With experience in SARS times, i really wish to see that Mexico, United States, and some other countries, which has the individuals affected with this disease, could strongly hold this disease, and could, in soonest time possible, recover financially, and medically, from the devastation brought by this disease. We of course, in our utmost ability, could answer their call for help if it is necessary to do so. This is what i wish to say for myself.

And i hope that as a well-known writer for stimulating and inspiring people to think in a new perspective, you could help them by writing some articles discussing the possible solutions that can be adopted by them to cure this disease. I have attached, in this mail, several articles written by you in the past, that could guide you to think deeper and broader of the problem of the virus.

I am looking forward to seeing your reply.

Best wishes,
william

蟑蝴聯婚，我很同意

Leechard,

Were i be allowed to choose, i shall agree on the marriage between the cockroaches and butterflies. I believe that cockroach, who tries to learn the new culture from butterfly,shall be a good companion of butterfly. Butterfly, which finds itself being the centre of inspiration of cockroach, would admire the cockroach very much and fall in love with it. This is the good match in the context of philosophy,and romance, which could overcome any obstacles so present in the days they live as the couples.

This should be your opinion, i think.

I wish to see your comments on that.

Best wishes,
william

回憶好像一條鞭子

Ted 已針對您的文章「之四十八：一者來，一者去」留下新意見：

「回憶好像一條鞭子。每一下，都鞭進最難受的地方。」

很同意這句 ... ...

有時明知回憶痛苦，卻仍要回憶。是因回憶才令人自覺存在過，還是逃避現實，即使回憶也是痛苦？

ted


李察回應：

未必一切回憶都苦味的呢。

♥♥♥♥♥ Jennifer™® ♥♥♥♥♥

♥♥♥♥♥ Jennifer™® ♥♥♥♥♥

已針對您的文章「愛情花園」留下新意見：

your blog is feel good


李察回應：

噢，你的名字，很有創意哦！

獨專儒術係正面定係負面呢？

Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:49:03 +0800


1.我想知漢高祖點解要祭孔
係出於尊敬佢?
2.咁有冇D咩事跡可以講返有關漢高祖受到孔子o既影響?
3.我又想知漢武帝獨專儒術係正面定係負面呢?

唔該我想要D詳細解釋同埋個人意見~thx!!

Tai CheukYin




李察回應：

謝謝你的問題。

漢武帝獨專儒術肯定係負面。只是不知你為何這樣問。是否你有另外的意見？
至於漢朝皇帝愛儒術，是因為，他們只想到統治上的便利，容易控制。但沒有
想到文化的發展需要。儒學肯定了長者的絕對權威，又否定研究大自然，是不利
於文化發展的。
漢高祖的故事很多，有空另外詳述。

李察謹上

李察你想表達甚麼？

.....I think the story of butterfly and cockroach is an analogy which should not been interpreted in the literal context, but in the context of philosophy. The main theme of the story is not to downgrade and humiliate the culture of cockroaches, but describe, in a very romantic way, the situation when two cultures, with one being seen as better by other, meet. The butterfly in the story represents some people of rich family, or of good talent, while cockroach represent people coming from poor family, or of not good talent. The story that cockroach changes its habitat and its color to suit its partner, butterfly, is just showing a natural reaction of people, who thought itself not so good as the partner one. Such story, of course, is not first invented by leechard. It has happened many times at many intervals in history. Russian modernization under Peter the Great, Chinese and Japanese modernization at late 19 century. I think this is the message leechard is going to convey through his story, and this story, with appropriate words and expressions used, is a good one in expressing clearly this ideas to all his readers and fans here.

I really hope that those cockroaches would well-understand that after they have read my explanations here. I really wish to see those cockroaches to reply to me, or your reply towards my letter.

Best wishes,
william


李察回應：

故事其實跟昆蟲類無關。故事想講的是人類的「文化」現象。
但這似乎是太學術化了點，所以用故事形式表達吧了。
不過，「文化」是太枯躁的題材，沒幾人有興趣的。

李察謹上

他的王牌，並非能源。

Peggy 已針對您的文章「美國總統是甚麼「層次」？」留下新意見：

他的王牌, 大概是能源吧, 你知道現代文明建立在能源上, 冇能源咩都唔駛玩, 美國可以玩曬!
Peggy


李察回應：

他的王牌，並非能源。
請看清楚內文。

所謂「層次」，並非 標簽、、

Leechard,

Were charisma, being brought by the unselfish thought, would be the main characteristics of people in first layer of thought, then there are many figures can represent the first layer of thoughts. Greek Ancient Emperor Alexander the Great can be one, and the British World War 2 hero, Winston churchill can be another one.

In his first inauguration speech to be the British premier, Churchill, seeing that German threat then was approaching the motherland, and that endangered the independence and life of English nation, declared that:I have nothing to offer but tears, blood, sweat, and tolls. It was largely due to the power of this speech, that help Churchhill to gain the support of the members of Parliament there, and the support of whole nation to fight until the end. And from then onwards, British nations united; the British commonwealth, British nations and other world forces united, to fight against Nazi and Facists until they are completely overthrown. This resembles, in some extents, to the tale of Alexdaria that he prefer throwing the water to drinking it himself. I suppose it is because behind these great men lie the great western thinking network, the unselfish thought, that make them so charming in eyes of people at their days, and in future times.

So, i dare to suggest that it would be better if you could include the Churchill story in world war 2, particularly during the battle of England, in your article on first layer of thought. This would let your friends and fans to have a deeper and braoder insight in what the centre thought of first layer of thought is.

I wish to hear from you the comments made on that.

Best wishes,
william


李察回應：

如果李察小文使人有如此印象：某某人是第一層，某某人是第二層，
則此是李察表達不清楚的錯。謹此致歉。

李察上

波斯皇帝宰開老人的幼子的事

李察先生

記得以往聽別人或書中所言

所謂邏輯，是一工具，並無善惡

只是用來判斷一件事情

或行為或語言是否合理

所以你所提及

有關

波斯皇帝宰開老人的幼子的事

應該並非是不符合邏輯

而是不符合倫理道德


李察回應

你是對的。嚴格說，是應該如此說。
但這也是一種「理性」。四個孩子
參軍，也儘夠了。連第五個也不放過，
就是不理智。這是在邏輯思維之外的。

受難節的紀念

燕子在鐵線上一張使李察震動的好照片

家燕飛行之一





家燕飛行之二





燕子在鐵線上







李察先生：

我是你的網誌的忠實讀者，日前看到你寫有關燕子，提及燕子相片，現附上三張相片，跟你分享。
年初我加入了香港觀鳥會，學習觀鳥。
日前參加了會的活動，到尖鼻咀觀鳥，拍到一張家燕站在鐵線上的照片。
上月到米埔觀鳥，拍了兩張家燕飛行的照片，但有點模糊呢！
另會中有位朋友，拍到白腰雨燕的飛行的照片，可參考以下網址。
http://www.hkbws.org.hk/BBS/viewthread.php?tid=7824
還香港中文大學本部圖書館簷下有很多燕子巢，春夏黃昏時，常有很多燕子歸巢，滿天飛舞。那是另一品種，叫小白腰雨燕。以下網址有介紹。
http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/greencampus/b5/fandf/swift.htm

參加了觀鳥會後，我想到一個問題：莊子喜歡觀鳥嗎？
希望 先生日後有機會賜教。

晚輩
陳仲寧



李察回應：

或者是剛剛寫完了那篇關於燕子的小文章吧。看了你拍的燕子照片，感動非常。
似乎，半個地球的風霜，都己經在那燕子身上了。
這照片，精采處是不見燕子的眼。如果見了，那種感覺，也許就沒有了。

知道嗎？在潛意識深處，李察是很喜歡講「耶穌」的呢。

nightingale 已針對您的文章「之四十六：下雨了，你怎樣想？」留下新意見：

我的證明方法︰

依個世界係無神的？
如果佢係錯誤的，依個世界就是有神。

不過人的錯誤價值觀會歪曲依一條問題。所以尋找信仰係一條好困難的路，你是經歷過先至找到答案。



由 nightingale 於 2009年04月06日 星期一 下午11:32 張貼在 李察 問到底

李察回應：

謝謝你，nightingale!

知道嗎？在潛意識深處，李察是很喜歡講「耶穌」的呢。

不是人們喜歡吃喝玩樂，而是有人鼓吹吃喝玩樂

blogger 567 提到...

我是很想傳給朋友看. 只是當吃喝玩樂是他們生來之權利, 我也無從反駁. 想到著實是他們不智? 或是個人想法加於他們身上? 不解也...... 不明者就是如何說也不明. 就只覺得你在無的放矢一樣. 大道理太大不易懂, 小道理太小不說也罷. 就是吃喝玩樂的人們想法了.

2009年04月04日 星期六 上午5:02


Leechard 李察 提到...

所謂「與生俱來」，　其實就是動物的本能。比較高級的動物，會開始求知。人類是更高級的動物：他們會鼓勵其他種族，其他文化的　人去享樂，讓他們日漸腐敗，從而達到他們自私的目的。

2009年04月04日 星期六 下午12:56


李察回應：

不是人們喜歡吃喝玩樂，而是有人鼓吹吃喝玩樂